Hier geht es zum Podcast. Das Video zu meinem Talk gibt es auf Youtube. Composing music with the help of technology is not as novel as the current discussion lets on: In the s, for instance, the composer Lejaren Hiller used a computer to produce the first computer-generated score - the "Illiac" Suite for string quartet. The panel discussion I moderated for the music business conference Most Wanted:Music explored the potential of artificial intelligence for creativity and looked at how it can expand our toolbox and the scope of inspiration to create art.
The panel discussion also addressed possible risks and inherent legal questions and speculated about the future ahead. Aber muss das eigentlich sein, beziehungsweise sieht so der Musikkonsum von morgen aus? Hier geht es zum Video. Das terrestrische Radio ist nach wie vor das beliebteste Musikmedium. Es ist schon lange kein Geheimnis mehr, dass Playlisten einen tiefgreifenden Effekt auf Promotion, Vermarktung und Monetarisierung haben. Der Musicday auf der re:publica TEN zeigte verschiedene Varianten, wie Technologien die Musikproduktion und -visualisierung und selbst das Musiksammeln beeinflussen und erweitern.
- Tack Sharp: A Step By Step Guide To Nailing Focus?
- Similar authors to follow.
- ISBN 13: 9783401053912.
- 18th Century German Philosophy Prior to Kant.
K7 Music und mir die Kernthemen des Musicdays. Einen Audio-Mitschnitt des Talks gibt es hier. Hier gibt es den gesamten Artikel zur Ansicht. Hier ist ein Auszug aus dem Konzept mit dem Titel 25 Jahre Mauerfall: Gesellschaftliche und technologische Innovation und die Entstehung freier Wissensgesellschaften :. Unter anderem wurde die Veranstaltung auf netzpolitik. Direkt im Anschluss an den Music Hack Day , der am 5.
Die Geschichte lief unter anderem in der Berliner Morgenpost. Bereits am Montag den Auf Facebook zum Opening anmelden Vorgestellt werden auch die wichtigsten Veranstaltungen, Forschungslabore, Arbeitsorte, Zahlen und Fakten. Aber Hand aufs Herz, wen interessiert das schon in der Retrospektive? Bild: Andreas Schwartz von gigmit. In dem dreiseitigen Beitrag wird auch der Music Start Up Corner besprochen und ich werde mit folgenden Statement zitiert: "Von den teilnehmenden Start-ups gab es durchweg positives Feedback.
Beide Unternehmen liefern sichderzeit ein Rennen um die Streaming-Weltherrschaft. Aber ist Musik-Streaming, so wie wir es heute kennen, ein ausgereiftes Produkt? Den ganzen Beitrag als PDF gibt es hier. Here's one. However, willi and those BE speakers who flinched at 'whose' may also have a point. Interestingly, Burchfield, the editor of the current revised edition of Fowler's for BE, seems to backtrack on this one, disagreeing in part with Fowler and apparently sympathizing with the many BE speakers perhaps somewhat older, like JGMcI?
I do agree with Burchfield that, in theory, there might be times when 'of which' is preferable, and that it isn't wrong unless it sounds awkward. But when it comes to the specific examples he chose, I'm afraid I can't really see the need for 'the captain of which,' 'the landlady of which,' etc. I'm also not convinced by his claim about 'essays and monographs' -- that may have been wishful thinking on his part, or rather, only those essays and monographs whose rather old-fashioned style he happens to like.
Let's look at a social register that we don't expect to find in many well-written books-- everyday chatting with your friends; kids.
You are here
These may sound awful written down or analyzed at all. For instance: there was that book that the title was so stupid he crashed right into that building where the landlord is such a creep notice the use of 'where' My examples would be off so I won't try. She's in the organization where I am the chair whose chair I am? I did, then changed my mind and erased it, then decided to include the examples anyway. This is very informal. But not negligible. Other speech registers could be in a classroom children vs grad students , in a public service situation, meeting an important person in a formal situation, or when you are totally pissed hee hee for us Amis that means angry but for the Brits it means drunk.
Swear words belong to certain registers which vary widely depending on many factors such as age, context, social position, mood, personality, intent and not to others. Now when one says 'of which' outnumbers 'whose' in an essay or monograph, and one disagrees, I would suggest that it is not only how old-fashioned or modern the thing may be, but what your definition of it is what the heck's a monograph?
Case in point. An essay can be a paragraph long, a page, two pages, in school.
- Website of Dr. Makarius Wenzel.
- Denvers City Park and Whittier Neighborhoods (Images of America);
- Martial Arts, Self-Defense and a Whole Lot More: The Best of Wims Blog, Volume 1?
- Isabella - Munich, Germany ( books);
If it gets up past about 5 pages it's a paper. Later on you might write a research paper; still far later a thesis. Then you may publish a scientific article. Which differs wildly from a newspaper or magazine article not nearly so much in Germany. In my book as yet unwritten, but obviously needed. In my book these are many more of which's than who's. I was raised in a very academic environment. I have never had a television, and lived in a rural area for most of my childhood.
I am a voracious reader, and importantly, I read the classics as well as current literature. Thus I use words like thus. Thus I have had less contact with 'bastardizations' That is not judgmental! I have certainly found myself at a crossroads at some points, not knowing whether I could use whose for a particular object say, a table whose legs were wobbly-- weird to me or not in an essay or paper! My written language is less modern and more formal than many. People with more of a pop culture background and life have of course been exposed far more to bastardizations of anything, and it is the masses which in the end make a word a word, over the long haul a grammatical bit what it is.
So 'whose' is far more accepted than I knew-- that a standard grammar book would allow it. Ok, I bow to it. I must say, though it was difficult to come up with examples, there are plenty of times when it would be awkward to use 'whose'-- depending on the formality. It is just somewhat awkward in English for objects to possess things.
KudoZ™ translation help
I personally prefer your first sentence although I believe that both are grammatically correct - the second sentence sounds stilted though! Hier ganz klar "which", denn es handelt sich um eine Sache. Werner: "Die Fragen ergeben sich nur bei Personen" That is not quite correct - or would you call an animal a person? I do agree with your comments and I did say I preferred the first version , but after thinking I was losing my grammar touch I googled various company names in inverted commas with whose and you find quite a few hits e.
AUTOMOBILE / BORGWARD: Der Bastler - DER SPIEGEL 51/
Lis: Maybe you are not so far off, after all. Habe gereade festgestellt, dass Sophils Link das am besten belegt. Willi, was belegt? People who disagree with the use of "whose" for inanimate objects are being a little finicky, I would say. The only way to leave a review is to first make a booking. That's how we know our reviews come from real guests who have stayed at the property. When guests stay at the property, they check out how quiet the room is, how friendly the staff is, and more.
After their trip, guests tell us about their stay. We check for naughty words and verify the authenticity of all guest reviews before adding them to our site. Register — opens a dialog box. Sign in — opens a dialog box. Les Brevieres Hotels. We Price Match. Chalet Chardons Isabella. Free WiFi Chardons Isabella Reserve now. Show me more. What would you like to know? Enter your feedback I already have a booking with this property Submit. Thank you for your time Your feedback will help us improve this feature for all of our customers Close. Missing some information?
Most Popular Facilities Free parking. Free WiFi. Family rooms. Lock in a great price for your upcoming stay Get instant confirmation with FREE cancellation on most rooms! Availability We Price Match. When would you like to stay at Chardons Isabella? Reservations longer than 30 nights are not possible.
Enter your dates to check availability. Your departure date is invalid. Check-in Date. Check-out Date. Double or Twin Room with Private Bathroom 2 twin beds or 1 full bed.
Category Archives: Local
Parking: Free! Select everything you want to know more about. What do you want to know about the options you selected? Enter your feedback. Thanks for your time! Your feedback will help us improve so you can book more easily next time. Thanks for your response. Double or Twin Room with Shared Bathroom 2 twin beds or 1 full bed. Triple Room with Private Bathroom 1 twin bed and 1 queen bed or 3 twin beds. Need more details before you book your stay? Contact the host. See availability Area Info — This neighborhood is a great choice for travelers interested in mountain walks, clean air and scenery — Check location Good location — show map.
Are you missing any information about this area? Pets Pets are not allowed.
Internet Free! Parking Free! Miscellaneous Smoke-free property Family rooms. Languages Spoken English French. What topic s do you want to know more about?